Operational workspaces
A working interface for the team’s current tasks, materials, and actions.
We design working systems around a real company process, connecting data, business logic, and an employee-facing interface while adding AI only where it is useful.
A ready-made product can be the right choice for a standard process. But some workflows are split between spreadsheets, messages, and several services, with important context moved manually from one tool to another.
The system is shaped around the process and its users rather than a fixed list of features.
A working interface for the team’s current tasks, materials, and actions.
Structured information, business rules, and process history in one working context.
Status, results, evidence, or reports where they help the team review and decide.
AI capabilities as part of a broader system when they fit the specific workflow.
A working system connects the company process with data, rules, and an interface. AI can be an optional layer, but it is not a requirement: the working flow and control of results come first.
What the team does and what result it needs.
The information, documents, and history required to work.
Rules, states, and the next step in the process.
The application employees use to execute the task.
Control, action, reporting, or preserved process history.
A live AI workspace for sales teams: commercial proposal generation from corporate templates, AI-powered sales training, sales scripts, team analytics, and shared working materials in one system.
Open DH Sales Workspace ↗An AI-enabled application built around a concrete operational review process: transcription, participant identification, personal-data redaction, checklist scoring, evidence, call questions, and PDF reporting.
It is a good fit when the process is standard, the team can adapt, and the required workflow already exists.
It becomes reasonable when the process is specific, context is spread across systems, and the team needs an interface around its own logic and data.
Understand participants, current tools, and the expected result.
Define the information, rules, and history the team needs.
Design the interface and the main way people will work.
Build the application and connect required interaction points.
Check scenarios, result control, and working history.
An internal system is the working application people use to execute a process. AI automation connects repeated actions and handoffs. Custom AI describes a broader applied AI system, which may include an internal tool as one part.
RAG is appropriate when the specific need is finding information in internal documents and producing answers with verifiable sources.
When the system needs knowledge retrieval →When the process is specific, spread across several tools, and the team needs a working interface around its own logic and data.
No. The process and required interface come first; AI is added only where it fits the task.
That depends on the process and available interaction points. Integration formats are designed after the system is understood.
An internal system is where people execute the process. AI automation focuses on repeated actions and handoffs between stages.
When the process is standard, the required stages already exist, and the team can work within the product’s constraints.